Myanmar’s Junta Has No Limits

On the same day Aung San Suu Kyi was sentenced, one of Myanmar’s most prominent Christian leaders, Hkalam Samson , faced charges of unlawful association that could lead to at least three years in jail. Hkalam Samson, former president of the Kachin Baptist Convention and now chair of the Kachin National Consultative Assembly, was arrested at Mandalay International Airport on Dec. 5, 2022, as he attempted to leave for Bangkok. He is reportedly being held in Myitkyina prison, where he is denied family visits, and there are concerns about his health, as he suffers from high blood pressure and bronchitis.

Aung San Suu Kyi and her party, the National League for Democracy, won an overwhelming victory in November 2020 elections and were poised to begin a second term of government. Under Myanmar’s military-drafted constitution, the military controlled key ministries in government—notably home affairs, border affairs, and defense—in a power-sharing arrangement with the civilian-led government. But by February 2021, commander in chief Min Aung Hlaing decided he had enough of the power-sharing agreement that began in 2015 and wanted the top job for himself.

Myanmar’s military dictatorship brought 2022 to an end in just as inhumane and brutal a manner as it had attempted to rule the country throughout the year: by sentencing democracy leader and former de facto head of government Aung San Suu Kyi to another seven years in prison on sham charges of corruption, taking her total sentence to 33 years. The 77-year-old Nobel laureate, who has been jailed over the past 18 months on 19 false charges, faces the prospect of spending the rest of her life behind bars.

Myanmar’s military dictatorship brought 2022 to an end in just as inhumane and brutal a manner as it had attempted to rule the country throughout the year: by sentencing democracy leader and former de facto head of government Aung San Suu Kyi to another seven years in prison on sham charges of corruption, taking her total sentence to 33 years. The 77-year-old Nobel laureate, who has been jailed over the past 18 months on 19 false charges, faces the prospect of spending the rest of her life behind bars.

Aung San Suu Kyi and her party, the National League for Democracy, won an overwhelming victory in November 2020 elections and were poised to begin a second term of government. Under Myanmar’s military-drafted constitution, the military controlled key ministries in government—notably home affairs, border affairs, and defense—in a power-sharing arrangement with the civilian-led government. But by February 2021, commander in chief Min Aung Hlaing decided he had enough of the power-sharing agreement that began in 2015 and wanted the top job for himself.

On the same day Aung San Suu Kyi was sentenced, one of Myanmar’s most prominent Christian leaders, Hkalam Samson, faced charges of unlawful association that could lead to at least three years in jail. Hkalam Samson, former president of the Kachin Baptist Convention and now chair of the Kachin National Consultative Assembly, was arrested at Mandalay International Airport on Dec. 5, 2022, as he attempted to leave for Bangkok. He is reportedly being held in Myitkyina prison, where he is denied family visits, and there are concerns about his health, as he suffers from high blood pressure and bronchitis.

The regime has a history of targeting or attempting to use religious groups, which play a very prominent role in Myanmar’s civil society. Although the vast majority of the overall population is Buddhist and Buddhist monks and laypeople play a visible role in society, Christians are a majority among the Kachin and Chin ethnic groups as well as a significant proportion of the Karen and Karenni, and they serve in key leadership positions within the resistance. Throughout Myanmar, monasteries, pagodas, mosques, and churches are vital centers of community activism and humanitarian support.

Jailing Aung San Suu Kyi for 33 years is a vindictive act designed solely to ensure, at all costs, that she will never again enter the political or public arena unless the regime falls. The brutal treatment of a Nobel Peace Prize winner shows that the military cares nothing for its international reputation. The arrest of Hkalam Samson, whom I know personally, is a similar rebuff to world opinion.

Although not possessing the same global profile as Aung San Suu Kyi, Hkalam Samson is nevertheless an internationally respected religious leader. He has been an outspoken advocate for human rights and peace for the Kachin people and recognized for his activism on the global stage. His arrest and detention are profoundly concerning. The United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Canada, and other governments—together with parliamentarians, human rights groups, and religious leaders around the world—must speak out for him urgently and call for his release.

But clearly, calls alone are not enough. The junta has shown that is does not respond to persuasion. In his September 2022 report, former U.S. Rep. Thomas Andrews, the United Nations special rapporteur for human rights in Myanmar, said the country’s crisis was spiraling from “bad to worse to horrific.” He accused Myanmar’s military of committing crimes against humanity and war crimes. The Biden administration has already recognized atrocities against the predominantly Muslim Rohingya as genocide. According to Andrews, 1.3 million people have been displaced, 28,000 homes have been destroyed, and more than 13,000 children have been killed.

Throughout last year, the junta continued its crackdown with extraordinary intensity. At least four pro-democracy leaders, including a former parliamentarian, were executed while another 10 leaders—including seven university students—were sentenced to death. The military torched the home village of the country’s first ever Catholic cardinal, Charles Maung Bo, possibly as a deliberate warning to Charles Maung Bo, who is an outspoken activist, and killing seven civilians, including a 9-year-old boy. Dozens of airstrikes have hit villages across the country, around 13,000 political prisoners languish in jail, and thousands of people have been killed or driven from their homes.

Yet this crisis hardly registers on the international agenda. Not until Dec. 21, 2022—less than two weeks ago—did the United Nations Security Council pass a resolution on Myanmar, the first in 74 years, despite it being almost two years since the coup and decades of atrocities by the military. The resolution simply calls for an end to violence in the country and the release of political prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi. It expresses “deep concern” at the continuing state of emergency imposed by the military and its “grave impact” on civilians. And it called for “concrete and immediate actions” to implement a peace plan and to “uphold democratic institutions and processes and to pursue constructive dialogue and reconciliation.” Even then, while 12 member states voted in favor, Russia, China, and India abstained.

Only last month, the U.S. Congress passed significant legislation—the so-called Burma Act—as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, and U.S. President Joe Biden has signed it into law. This imposes further sanctions on Myanmar’s military regime and designates $50 million per year over five years for support for Myanmar’s democracy movement as well as $220 million in humanitarian aid for 2023.

The U.N. Security Council resolution and the Burma Act are very welcome but long overdue. And although the U.S. legislation includes some very significant concrete measures, the U.N.’s resolution is only meaningful if it translates into action by member states. As Andrews said: “The people of Myanmar are deeply disappointed … by those nations that voice support for them but then fail to back up their words with action. The stakes could not be higher.”

There are three immediate, practical steps to take.

First, sanction supplies of aviation fuel to Myanmar. According to Amnesty International, Puma Energy, ExxonMobil, Thai Oil, PetroChina and Rosneft are the major sources of aviation fuel to Myanmar’s military. Between March 2021 and August 2022, there were 16 air attacks against civilians in villages in Myanmar’s ethnic regions. These strikes destroyed homes, religious buildings, hospitals, schools, and a camp for displaced people as well as injured countless people and killed at least 15 civilians. And these are only the strikes Amnesty International documented. If as many countries as possible sanction aviation fuel to Myanmar, then it would help impede the military’s ability to bomb its people—at least for a while.

Second, sanction the two regimes that keep Myanmar’s illegal junta alive: President Vladimir Putin’s Russia and President Xi Jinping’s China, which supply the military with arms, finance, and diplomatic cover. Their regimes should be sanctioned for complicity in Myanmar’s atrocity crimes. A global arms embargo should be coordinated and enforced, and targeted sanctions should be imposed against Russian arms providers and Chinese companies investing in Myanmar, particularly in the lucrative mining, oil, and gas sectors

Third, provide humanitarian aid to Myanmar’s internally displaced people and refugees on its borders with neighboring countries. This can be done through local Burmese civil society groups that have experience working with international donors and delivering cross-border aid as well as through coalitions of well-established international aid agencies, such as the Border Consortium working along the Thailand-Myanmar border. The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and the European Union should step up their efforts to coordinate a humanitarian response.

In short, cut the lifeline to the regime and provide a lifeline to the people.

The world faces many crises, and there is a struggle for headlines. But while Myanmar’s tragedy may be forgotten, it needs action. Myanmar is Asia’s Ukraine—a human rights and humanitarian catastrophe, with civilian casualties targeted by an aggressor’s bombs—except the aggressor is not a foreign invader but an illegal regime that overthrew a democratically elected civilian government. This cannot be allowed to stand.

Chinese Woman Sued For Dumping 12,500 Kg Exotic Catfish In Lake For ‘good Luck’

A Chinese woman on Thursday found herself in a legal mess after she bought 12.5 tonnes of exotic catfish and dumped it in the lake in order to bring herself some “good luck”. The woman, identified only by her surname Xu, purchased the ray-finned exotic fish for 90,000 yuan (approx ₹10.8 lakhs) to conduct the Buddhist ritual and released them into the fresh waterbody to perish. Chinese authorities initiated a public interest lawsuit against the woman, as they had to remove the dead fish from the water for up to 10 days in eastern China’s Jiangsu province, paper.cn reported.

A case was heard in a court in Changzhou city, where the woman argued that she dumped the fish in the lake to mark the 2000-year-old ritual that says humans freeing animals from captivity will bring good luck. The Chinese woman said that she expected “good karma” but her act was labelled as animal cruelty since the fish could not have survived in the lake.

The court also slapped charges on the woman relating to environmental risks and hazards. The woman said that she bought catfish because it was “cheap” and unclear about the consequences of her actions. Court reminded that the fish “quickly died” after being released into the lake by her in an attempt to do a ritual.

2000-year-old ritual that leads to legal penalties

In September 2022, similarly, another fishmonger surnamed Liu was sued in court and was ordered to pay 90,000 yuan for dumping the fish into the lake which caused their instant death. Liu stated that he was not guilty of any crime and that his act was innocent. “I just want to do a good job. Why should I pay for that action?” he had maintained according to the Chinese press.

Another man was similarly charged in China’s southern Guangxi province. He was asked to pay 28,000 yuan (approx ₹3.3 lakhs) for releasing 10 glass-cleaning fish, 10 turtles, and more than 10 kilograms of copper flamingo. The 2,000-year-old tradition in China is practiced as people believe that releasing the animals into the natural environment will be the harbinger of good luck and prosperity.

Many animals such as turtles, fish, and birds are intentionally bought and left in the natural environment. The exotic animals, however, not only threaten the natural environment, they also tend to die when displaced.

China Seeks To Improve Relations With US But Vows To Fight Against ‘all Forms Of Hegemony’

China’s new top diplomat, Wang Yi, has vowed to work towards improving relations between China and the United States in a New Year’s Day message, as per a report from South China Morning Post. In an article published in Qiushi, the magazine of China’s ruling Communist Party, Wang, who is now director of the general office of the Central Foreign Affairs Commission, confirmed that he had taken over from Yang Jiechi as China’s foreign policy supremo. Wang also pledged to deepen ties with Russia and achieve closer communication with Europe, as well as to deepen convergence on common interests with China’s neighbors.

In his article, Wang also vowed to fight against “all forms of hegemony” and to defend China’s sovereignty and security against any attempts by “external forces” to interfere in China’s domestic affairs. Wang specifically mentioned China’s reaction to US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, calling it a “firm willingness” to defend national security and sovereignty. It isn’t clear what was “firm” in that reaction as it more akin to a tantrum. It is possible that the rhetoric of Chinese diplomats is targetted at the domestic audience. In the absence of substantive gains, rhetoric is used to distract the populace.

Wang was promoted in October

Wang’s promotion to the Politburo, the top decision-making body of China’s ruling Communist Party, was announced at the party’s 20th national congress in October. He was widely expected to take over Yang’s role at that time. On Friday, Beijing named Qin Gang, its ambassador to Washington, as the new minister of foreign affairs, Wang’s former title. A new top envoy to the US has yet to be announced.

The overall tone of Wang’s message was one of cooperation and diplomacy, as he emphasized the importance of working towards a better relationship with the US and other countries. However, he also made it clear that China will not back down on issues related to its sovereignty and will defend itself against any attempts at “interference”. It should be flagged that China’s words have very little to do with its actions. In fact, its actions are almost always the opposite. Recently, reports emerged which revealed that China has been setting up police stations in foreign nations, to threaten and stifle the voices of people who oppose the CCP, especially people from Tibet, Xinjiang and China.

Chinese espionage in the US is also a big concern

In 2018, a Chinese national named Ji Chaoqun was arrested in Chicago on charges of acting as an agent of the Chinese government. Ji was accused of attempting to gather information on American engineers and scientists for the Chinese government, and was later sentenced to prison. Other cases have involved Chinese agents attempting to steal trade secrets from American companies. In 2019, a Chinese scientist named Hua Jun Zhao was sentenced to prison for attempting to steal genetically modified corn seeds from an American company.

In 2020, a Chinese researcher named Tan Dailin was charged with economic espionage for attempting to steal trade secrets related to aviation technology from an American company. The US government has also accused Chinese hackers of attempting to steal sensitive information from government agencies and American businesses. In 2020, the US Department of Justice indicted two Chinese hackers for their alleged involvement in a massive data breach at the Marriott hotel chain.

Maldives President, Bhutan’s PM & Other World Leaders Greet India On Its 74th Republic Day

On the occasion of India’s 74th Republic Day, world leaders extended warm greetings to Indians and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as the country marked with fervour the adoption of India’s constitution and its transition to a republic on January 26, 1950. As the day commenced with spectacular military and cultural pageantry, and celebration, Prime Minister Narendra Modi took to his official Twitter handle to remind that India’s Republic Day coincides with the Amrit Mahotsav of Independence, adding that it is time for the entire country to move in the path of progress united.

“Many wishes for Republic Day. This time this occasion is also special because we are celebrating it during the Amrit Mahotsav of Independence. We wish to move ahead in a united way to make the dreams of the great freedom fighters of the country come true. Happy Republic Day to all fellow Indians!”, Prime Minister Modi tweeted, wishing the citizens a Happy Republic Day.

गणतंत्र दिवस की ढेर सारी शुभकामनाएं। इस बार का यह अवसर इसलिए भी विशेष है, क्योंकि इसे हम आजादी के अमृत महोत्सव के दौरान मना रहे हैं। देश के महान स्वतंत्रता सेनानियों के सपनों को साकार करने के लिए हम एकजुट होकर आगे बढ़ें, यही कामना है।

Happy Republic Day to all fellow Indians! — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) January 26, 2023

Several world leaders took to their official Twitter handle to congratulate and extend best wishes to the Indians on a special day. The Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, took to their Twitter account to wish Indians on Indian Republic Day. The President of Maldives, Ibrahim Mohamed Solih, also extended warm greetings to the people of India. The Foreign Ministry of Maldives hailed the success of the Indian Constitution as an inspiration for other nations. “Wishing India peace, progress, and prosperity,” Maldives Foreign Minister, Abdulla Shahid, said.

The success of the Indian Constitution is an inspiration for nations. And the Indian democracy has not only survived, but is thriving.

Our warmest felicitations to the Gov & people of #India on the 74th Republic Day.

Wishing India peace, progress & prosperity. pic.twitter.com/rqMFAolkef — Abdulla Shahid (@abdulla_shahid) January 26, 2023

#WATCH | Israeli diplomats wishing India on the occasion of #RepublicDay

“Embassy of Israel in India join in on celebration of India’s rich heritage & cultural diversity by wishing our dear Indian friends in some regional languages,” tweets the Embassy

(Video:Embassy of Israel) pic.twitter.com/kptBMLslMt — ANI (@ANI) January 26, 2023

Warm greetings from Maldives to PM @narendramodi, government and people of India on their 74th Republic Day. May the the spirit of democracy, justice and peace long prevail in India. — Ibrahim Mohamed Solih (@ibusolih) January 26, 2023

“As we share national days, we celebrate the warm spirit of affection our people have long held for each other and the depth of our friendship. Australia and India have never been closer,” wrote Australian Prime Minister.

Celebration of India’s rich heritage and cultural diversity

India’s steadfast ally Israel also wished India on the occasion of Republic Day. “The Embassy of Israel in India joins in on the celebration of India’s rich heritage and cultural diversity by wishing our dear Indian friends in some regional languages,” the diplomats of Israel tweeted. Furthermore, Bhutan Prime Minister Lotay Tshering extended warm wishes to the “friends in India.” “The people of Bhutan and I send our best wishes and prayers to the people of India on the 74th Republic Day. As India charts a new path ahead, I offer my good wishes for India’s progress and prosperity,” he tweeted. Meanwhile, Brunei’s Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah ibni Omar Ali Saifuddien also congratulated the Indian citizens on a special day, wishing for India’s “progress and prosperity.”

Sending best wishes to @narendramodi and the people of India on Indian Republic Day. As we share national days, we celebrate the warm spirit of affection our people have long held for each other and the depth of our friendship. Australia and India have never been closer. 🇦🇺🇮🇳 pic.twitter.com/up1YoKYjUy — Anthony Albanese (@AlboMP) January 26, 2023

“The people of Bhutan and I send our best wishes and prayers to the people of India on the 74th Republic Day. As India charts a new path ahead, I offer my good wishes for India’s progress and prosperity,” wrote Butan’s leader.

HHDL, wearing a traditional hat from Himachal Pradesh, watching the Indian Republic Day Celebrations on TV at his residence in Dharamasala, HP, India on January 26, 2023. Photo by Tenzin Jamphel pic.twitter.com/Izgf6S7FU6 — Dalai Lama (@DalaiLama) January 26, 2023

In respect to 🇮🇳, I tried my best to play India’s beautiful anthem, “Jana Gana Mana”.

Happy Republic Day#RepublicDay2023 #RepublicDay pic.twitter.com/f7X78t1koL — Kobbi Shoshani 🇮🇱 (@KobbiShoshani) January 25, 2023

Australia and India share a deep friendship – dosti.

Today on Republic Day, I extend my best wishes to my good friend @DrSJaishankar and to the people of India and all who celebrate around the world today. pic.twitter.com/kZME1JDw8l — Senator Penny Wong (@SenatorWong) January 26, 2023

Après Twitter, the Deluge?

“It’s just so erratic and chaotic. With every new tweet [from Musk], some new thing happens,” he said in an interview with Foreign Policy soon after arriving in the city. “I think we deserve a chance to be heard. I think we deserve a chance to be tried.”

Bidawatka, the co-founder of Indian social media app Koo, was there to cash in on the disarray inside Musk’s Twitter.

On the day in mid-November when Elon Musk told Twitter’s remaining employees to commit to being “ hardcore ” or leave, Mayank Bidawatka landed in San Francisco on a one-way ticket and checked into an Airbnb downtown.

On the day in mid-November when Elon Musk told Twitter’s remaining employees to commit to being “hardcore” or leave, Mayank Bidawatka landed in San Francisco on a one-way ticket and checked into an Airbnb downtown.

Bidawatka, the co-founder of Indian social media app Koo, was there to cash in on the disarray inside Musk’s Twitter.

“It’s just so erratic and chaotic. With every new tweet [from Musk], some new thing happens,” he said in an interview with Foreign Policy soon after arriving in the city. “I think we deserve a chance to be heard. I think we deserve a chance to be tried.”

Koo’s fortunes have been intertwined with Twitter’s since day one. The social media platform, sporting a yellow bird logo to Twitter’s recognizable blue one, went mainstream in early 2021 when the Indian government was at loggerheads with Twitter over the company’s refusal to take down some accounts linked to protests in the country. Koo, presented as a homegrown alternative, was enthusiastically touted by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government, and several prominent officials and agencies have joined the platform (though Modi himself hasn’t yet).

The stakes are even higher now. Things inside Twitter have gone from bad to worse since Musk took over the company and laid off more than half of its global workforce, with reports of unpaid rent, a data center shutdown, and service outages around the world.

Musk himself has repeatedly cast doubt on Twitter’s viability, previously floating the possibility of bankruptcy and likening the platform to a plane about to crash.

A world without Twitter appears more likely by the day, and Koo is not the only rival waiting in the wings to replace it.

Millions have flocked to Mastodon, a nonprofit social media app founded by German developer Eugen Rochko in 2016 that functions as a collection of different platforms, or “servers,” rather than a single unified platform. Mastodon was installed nearly 3 million times worldwide in November (Musk took over Twitter on Oct. 27), a 138 percent increase from the previous month, according to data from market intelligence firm Sensor Tower.

Rochko has previously said he created Mastodon—years before Musk took over Twitter—because he was dissatisfied with Twitter’s platform and had concerns about too much control over speech by a single corporation.

Senior European technology officials, including antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager, have touted Mastodon as an alternative to Twitter.

Gerard de Graaf, Europe’s new senior digital envoy to Silicon Valley, also singled out Mastodon in a recent interview with Foreign Policy. “If Twitter goes bust, you would expect in a well-functioning market that some alternative will arise,” he said.

Mastodon’s sudden growth appears to be largely restricted to the West for now. The app’s downloads in the past two months came primarily from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, France, and the Netherlands, according to Sensor Tower.

Koo, meanwhile, has the opposite problem. The vast majority of its user base is still concentrated in India, Bidawatka said. The platform formally launched in its second country, Brazil, only in November, where it racked up more than a million downloads in its first month. Sensor Tower data shows those two countries accounted for more than 90 percent of new downloads in November and December. Nigeria’s government also began using Koo in June 2021, in the midst of its ultimately temporary ban on Twitter.

Still, Bidawatka—as evidenced by his impromptu trip to Silicon Valley—feels that now is the moment for Koo to break into the U.S. market.

Koo might have tried to build its U.S. base more systematically if it weren’t for Twitter’s Musk-induced chaos, he said. “I think now is a time when you need to let people know en masse.” It’s been slow going so far—the United States accounted for only 1 percent of Koo downloads in November and December.

Noam Bardin, the former CEO of Google-owned mapping tool Waze, recently started his own Twitter rival called Post, but he has kept the platform gated while it establishes operations and policies. As of Dec. 12, Post had just over 300,000 users, with around twice that number on a waitlist.

Twitter’s demise “would be terrible for freedom of expression and for the dissemination of political speech and alternative views,” said Yaman Akdeniz, a digital rights campaigner and law professor at Istanbul Bilgi University. Akdeniz uses his own country, Turkey, as an example, where Twitter fills “an important vacuum” for independent speech.

“Turkey will have an extremely crucial general elections during 2023, and although I am not sure how much Musk cares about freedom of expression outside the U.S., the platform remains as the most important platform for political debate,” he said. “So, I believe, a world without Twitter would be initially devastating for freedom of expression.”

Building that global influence has taken Twitter nearly two decades, several missteps, and a continuous recalibration of the platform’s operations.

“Twitter was as influential as it was because it had a degree of legitimacy and credibility with two groups of people: one is global civil society and the other is whichever state permitted it to operate,” said Chinmayi Arun, executive director of Yale University’s Information Society Project, adding that continuous engagement with both of those groups shaped internal governance, content policies, and business decisions for all Silicon Valley social media companies.

“I think we’re at a stage right now where Twitter is undoing all of what it did to earn this legitimacy and credibility,” she said.

For the moment, Musk’s latest big-ticket purchase remains online and functional. Rival platforms have had some wins: Twitter is filled with links to Mastodon and Post profiles, while Koo already has the backing of Indian government officials and recently added Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and the Dalai Lama to its user base.

But the initial gold rush after Musk’s Twitter takeover has slowed. According to Sensor Tower, downloads of both Mastodon and Koo fell by around 80 percent in December.

Although Twitter has effectively created and functioned as a “digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated,” to quote Musk’s words when he first decided to buy the platform, the loss of that town square may not necessarily result in a single, direct substitute.

Younger social media users who tend to be early adopters and trendsetters on the internet have been gravitating toward smaller online communities, according to Anne Collier, founder and executive director of the nonprofit Net Safety Collaborative who previously served on Twitter’s now-disbanded Trust and Safety Council. Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms rode a particular moment of rapid global internet growth, she added, but that space has been shrinking. Countries such as China and Russia are closing off their digital spaces to the rest of the world, and even governments such as India and the European Union are taking an increasingly hawkish stance against Silicon Valley companies.

Twitter’s demise—or even its current limping along under Musk—could well hasten that process.

“Twitter was kind of that ancient Roman forum where a community could come together, but it could be lots of communities that would meet based on their interests,” Collier said. “The loss of that forum is leaving a huge hole that I don’t see being replaced.”

The big questions for potential replacements will be whether they are prepared to handle a sudden influx of tens of millions of users, and how equipped they are to deal with issues such as misinformation and hate speech that have plagued Twitter and other platforms.

Rochko remains Mastodon’s sole full-time employee, and the company is currently crowdfunded. Despite many approaches from investors in recent weeks, Rochko has said he wants to keep it that way.

Bidawatka expressed confidence that Koo is “prepared to handle scale” and has processes in place to moderate content and verify users. “Our team is used to handling a sudden influx of people. We’ve had some time to prepare for what we plan to do.”

He did recognize that the company will have to expand and branch out from its current base in Bengaluru, known as India’s Silicon Valley, where nearly all of its 200 employees are based. Around 50 of those are focused on content moderation, he said, backstopping Koo’s machine-learning tools and working with fact-checkers to root out hate speech, misinformation, and other inappropriate or illegal content.

Ultimately, he hopes that Koo’s structural similarity to Twitter and its relative ease of use will convince people to join, and its support for posts in several different languages will heighten its global appeal. “We’ve always kept the skin the same,” he said. “We made it that easy for anybody to connect with anybody else. This is what makes this network extremely thick.”

Arun said that platforms’ abilities to deal with problematic content will be the make-or-break factor.

“One is doing a backsliding, and then the others are just all very different models that have never had to moderate content at this scale before,” she said. “It takes a lot of resources to do content moderation and to engage with all of these people who need to feel like the platform is hearing them and changing.”

Bidawatka, meanwhile, flew back to India on Christmas Day. But he’s contemplating a return to Silicon Valley later this month.

“I don’t look at this as a short sprint,” he told FP in early January. “For me, this is a marathon.”

PIB dismisses rumours that Ganga Vilas cruise got stuck in Bihar

Press Information Bureau (PIB) shared that the flagship Ganga Vilas Cruise, which was inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi last week, did not get stuck on the third day of its 51-day journey in Bihar’s Chhapra as claimed by news organisations.

As per the online reports, the cruise which was scheduled to dock at the shore for the tourists to visit Chirand, an archaeological site, got stuck because of water deficiency in the Ganges near the Doriganj area of the district. Chirand Saran, situated 11 km southeast of Chhapra near Doriganj Bazar, is the most important archaeological site in the district. Stupanuma fillings built on the banks of the Ghaghra river are seen to be associated with Hindu, Buddhist, and Muslim influences.

However, PIB has dismissed such reports and said that the claim which originated from a report by news agencies is false, and the cruise reached Patna as per schedule.

.@ANI has claimed that #GangaVilasCruise is stuck in Chhapra due to shallow water. #PIBFactCheck

▪️ This claim is #Fake.

▪️ The cruise is not stuck & has reached Patna as per schedule.

Read More👇

🔗https://t.co/1ehLEHVWiP pic.twitter.com/CdMzjOJTLj — PIB Fact Check (@PIBFactCheck) January 16, 2023

Meanwhile, Raj Singh, Chairman of Exotic Heritage Group which is operating the Ganga Vilas cruise, also told NDTV that the cruise was never stuck. He explained that the main ship always remains in the main channel, normal for cruise ships, and the travelers take smaller boats to go and do sightseeing.

Ganga Vilas- The longest river cruise ship in the world

Ganga Vilas is the longest motor cruise ship in the world. It was flagged off on January 13, 2023, by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

It will cover a distance of a whopping 3200 km in 50 days. During the course of its journey, ‘Ganga Vilas’ will pass through 27 river systems in both India and Bangladesh, including the Ganga and the Brahmaputra. This longest voyage by a river ship will mark the entry of India and Bangladesh into the world’s river cruise map.

Ganga Vilas Cruise also has special features. Its speed is up to 12 kilometres per hour upstream and 20 kilometres downstream. The cruise has an RO system for drinking water, along with a sewage treatment plant. The cruise has all the necessary facilities for the convenience of the people and their needs. Its fare in India is Rs 25,000 a day, while in Bangladesh the fare is Rs 50,000 a day.

The luxury triple-deck cruise will travel on the world’s longest waterway from Varanasi to Dibrugarh in Assam. The cruise has a capacity of 80 passengers with 18 suits. This cruise will go on an adventurous journey for 51 days and pass through Bangladesh for 15 days. Following this, it will go to Dibrugarh through the Brahmaputra river in Assam.

This cruise will pass through a total of 27 river systems of UP, Bihar, West Bengal, Bangladesh, and Assam. The cruise will pass through three major rivers Ganga, Meghna, and Brahmaputra. The cruise will enter the Bhagirathi, Hooghly, Bidyavati, Malata, and Sundarbans river systems in Bengal.

In Bangladesh, it will pass through Meghna, Padma, and Jamuna in Bangladesh and then enter the Brahmaputra in Assam.

According to an official statement, the 51 days cruise is planned with visits to 50 tourist spots including World Heritage Sights, National Parks, river Ghats, and major cities like Patna in Bihar, Sahibganj in Jharkhand, Kolkata in West Bengal, Dhaka in Bangladesh and Guwahati in Assam.

*This report has been updated as per the information provided by PIB

World ushers in New Year 2023 with mesmerising laser lights and fireworks

World ushers in New Year 2023 with mesmerising laser lights and fireworks

Written By: Wion Web Desk Updated: Jan 01, 2023, 12:59 PM IST

New Year is one of the rare occasions that almost the entire world celebrates. As 2023 starts on a Sunday, the world has different ways of preparing for the holiday. People have their cultural traditions and regional customs that will mark the end of 2022. Here are a few pictures from across the globe showing the world’s different ways to prepare for the arrival of 2023.

United States

Every year, thousands of people assemble at New York City’s Times Square to witness the gleaming ball drop at the stroke of midnight. Here’s a general view of the 2023 New Year’s Eve Ball at One Times Square.

(Photograph: AFP )

China

While the country grapples with its Covid crisis, it won’t back off from celebrating the New Year. The woman in the picture is a worker producing red lanterns ahead of New Year’s Day in Danzhai, Guizhou (China’s southwestern province).

(Photograph: AFP )

Russia

Amid the tensions between Russia and Ukraine, a New York decoration Kremlin star at the Gorky Park in Moscow bears a letter Z representing the Russian troops in Ukraine.

(Photograph: AFP )

Australia

Australians seem to be excited about the New Year celebration without restrictions after two years. The “family fireworks,” over the Opera House in Sydney were displayed for over three hours on New Year Eve’s.

(Photograph: AFP )

Ukraine

In Ukraine’s capital Kyiv, people have decorated concrete blocks as cartoon characters for the New Year. Within the action that ‘Children should not see war,’ volunteers have transformed blocks, earlier used to jam the streets. They served as checkpoints at the start of Russia’s invasion of the Kyiv region.

(Photograph: AFP )

Philippines

Fireworks light up the sky over Jones Bridge in Manila to celebrate during New Year celebrations.

(Photograph: AFP )

Philippines

The Philippines’ New Year’s Day tradition involves wearing polka dots and keeping circular fruits as it is ubiquitous. Here, a worker prints names on customised calendars ahead of the new year at a shop in Quezon City, Metro Manila.

(Photograph: AFP )

South Korea

During celebrations for the New Year at Jogye temple in Seoul, South Korea’s capital city, Buddhist followers hook name cards with wishes.

(Photograph: AFP )

Nepal

In Kathmandu, members of the indigenous Gurung Community wearing their traditional attires take part in New Year celebration ceremony, also known as “Tamu Lhosar.”

(Photograph: AFP )

Romania

In the end-of-the-year parade, young men and women participated in costumes along with musicians, police, and tourists. The event is a yearly tradition, believed to chase away the evil spirit of the coming year.

(Photograph: AFP )

India

Women painted their hands their hands and face painted ahead of New Year eve celebrations in Amritsar.

(Photograph: AFP )

Sri Lanka

Amid political and economic turmoil in the coutnry, Sri Lanka prepares to celebrate New Year. Fireworks explode over the port city as part of the celebrations in Colombo.

(Photograph: AFP )

Myanmar

People gather together to celebrate New Year at Yangon.

(Photograph: AFP )

Spain

Employees scour certified Vinalopo grapes at a vineyard processing plant in Novelda, eastern Spain. In a nearly century-old tradition, people eat 12 grapes as midnight strikes on New Year’s Eve. The custom promises good luck to those who manage a grape and wish per chime.

(Photograph: AFP )

Hong Kong

Citizens take pictures during a fireworks and laser show as they celebrate the New Year next to Victoria Harbour.

(Photograph: AFP )

United Kingdom

Fireworks at the famous London Eye ferris wheel in London, UK as the country welcomes the new year.

(Photograph: Reuters )

Brazil

Fireworks at the Copacabana beach, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on December 31, 2022.

(Photograph: Reuters )

France

People at the Champs Elysees avenue for New Year’s Eve celebrations in Paris, France, December 31, 2022.

(Photograph: Reuters )

3) Germany, Spain

Germany and Spain occupied the third spot as the passport holders of the two countries managed to have their way in 190 countries.

(Photograph: Reuters )

Japan

People release balloons as they welcome the year in Tokyo, Japan.

(Photograph: Reuters )

New York, United States

People gathered at Times Square, in Manhattan, New York, marking the first New Year’s event since the COVID-19 pandemic.

(Photograph: Reuters )

United Arab Emirates

Fireworks from the world’s tallest building during New Year’s Eve celebrations in Dubai.

(Photograph: Reuters )

London, UK

Fireworks and drones display marked the New Year, in London, UK.

(Photograph: Reuters )

Kenya

People look at fireworks launched from Old Mutual Tower in Nairobi to mark the New Year on January 1, 2023.

(Photograph: AFP )

Greece

Fireworks launched over the the Acropolis during New Year celebrations in Athens on January 1, 2023.

(Photograph: AFP )

Prez Biden Understands How Much Indian-Americans Have To Offer, Says Cincinnati Mayor Aftab Pureval

US President Joe Biden, whose administration has the largest number of India-Americans, understands how much the community has to offer in public service to the country and how special it is, Cincinnati City Mayor Aftab Pureval said.

He was speaking on the sidelines of the US Conference of Mayors Winter Meeting at the White House on Friday.

“It (appointing so many Indian-Americans and South Asians in key administration positions) means that President Biden doesn’t take the community for granted. He understands how special we are and how much we have to offer in public service to the country,” Pureval told PTI in an interview.

Pureval is the first Indian-American, Tibetan-American and Asian-American to be elected as the mayor of Cincinnati — the third largest city in Ohio. He was sworn in as the city mayor on January 4.

“I am here along with mayors from across the country to give President Biden an update on how the bipartisan infrastructure bill and ARP (American Rescue Plan) have not only sustained cities and saved them during the pandemic crisis but also enabled them to grow equitably. It’s been a huge success for Cincinnati, and I can’t wait to share those stories with him,” Pureval said.

The mayor had met India’s Ambassador to the US Taranjit Singh Sandhu in Cincinnati last week. Both come from Punjab.

“We talked about my family history. My father is from Punjab. He (Taranjit Singh Sandhu) is also from Punjab. We talked a lot about that. I had just recently visited the Dalai Lama in Dharamsala. I gave him an update on the trip,” he said.

“But largely we talked about how Cincinnati and Ohio can continue to strengthen their relationship with India. We have so many Indian immigrants, people of Indian descent in not just our city but (also) in the tri-state area. It was such an honour that he decided to come to Cincinnati to meet with me and our business and community leaders. I’m so grateful we have such a strong relationship,” he said.

Being the first Asian-American mayor of Cincinnati, Pureval said, is a huge honour but also a huge responsibility.

“First and foremost, it’s my job to fight for the residents of Cincinnati. But it’s not lost on me that it’s also important to achieve so that I won’t be the last South Asian or the last Tibetan mayor not just in Cincinnati but in the country,” he said.

“I am so proud of our community, the Indian and the Tibetan communities, for how much we have achieved in this country.

“I am the product of the path that has been blazed by so many other people, including, frankly, my parents who moved to this country in their early 20s, not knowing anybody, not having anything and they made their way through this country and through this world. I will forever be grateful for that decision,” he said.

Responding to a question, Pureval said the first two years of the Biden administration have been a “massive success” and listed the infrastructure bill for rebuilding the country and ARP for supporting families, middle-class families, low-income families who were struggling to make ends meet during the COVID-19 lockdown as some of the achievements.

The CHIPS Act, he asserted, is transforming the way semiconductors are made in this country.

“In fact, it paved the way for one of the largest semiconductor plants built in the world in Ohio, which is going to have a huge impact on our local economy. And then (there is) the Inflation Reduction Act, one of the biggest pieces of climate change legislation ever,” he added.

Pureval further said President Biden has proved all those wrong who were sceptical about his commitment and ability to work in a bipartisan way.

India and China’s Latest Border Clash Is Not a One-Off

This month’s clash is not a one-off. Arunachal Pradesh has been the site of regular skirmishes in recent months, even as tensions remain high in the Ladakh region on the western section of the China-India border. Chinese provocations in the east reflect a breakdown of Indian deterrence. New Delhi’s trade with Beijing has increased, diplomatic ties have remained normal, and India has not undertaken local military operations. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s reputation for toughness and resolve—essential for deterrence—has been tested and found wanting.

New Delhi blamed Beijing for trying to “ unilaterally change the status quo ,” while the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) said it was conducting a regular patrol when its troops were “blocked by the Indian Army illegally crossing” the border, known as the Line of Actual Control (LAC). Two days later, local military commanders from both sides agreed to a disengagement that prevents an eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation at the ridge , near the edge of the Yangtse plateau. Still, Chinese and Indian soldiers remain separated by just 500 feet .

In the early hours of Dec. 9, a few hundred Chinese soldiers armed with batons, spikes, and other primitive weapons tried to dislodge an Indian Army outpost on a ridge on the disputed border between India’s easternmost state, Arunachal Pradesh, and Tibet, which is governed by China. The Indian Army warded off the attackers, but the clash was fierce, injuring 34 Indian soldiers.

In the early hours of Dec. 9, a few hundred Chinese soldiers armed with batons, spikes, and other primitive weapons tried to dislodge an Indian Army outpost on a ridge on the disputed border between India’s easternmost state, Arunachal Pradesh, and Tibet, which is governed by China. The Indian Army warded off the attackers, but the clash was fierce, injuring 34 Indian soldiers.

New Delhi blamed Beijing for trying to “unilaterally change the status quo,” while the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) said it was conducting a regular patrol when its troops were “blocked by the Indian Army illegally crossing” the border, known as the Line of Actual Control (LAC). Two days later, local military commanders from both sides agreed to a disengagement that prevents an eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation at the ridge, near the edge of the Yangtse plateau. Still, Chinese and Indian soldiers remain separated by just 500 feet.

This month’s clash is not a one-off. Arunachal Pradesh has been the site of regular skirmishes in recent months, even as tensions remain high in the Ladakh region on the western section of the China-India border. Chinese provocations in the east reflect a breakdown of Indian deterrence. New Delhi’s trade with Beijing has increased, diplomatic ties have remained normal, and India has not undertaken local military operations. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s reputation for toughness and resolve—essential for deterrence—has been tested and found wanting.

Modi is trapped by his own nationalist rhetoric: Since deadly border clashes in Ladakh in 2020, India’s government has downplayed the border crisis to shield the prime minister’s macho image. China has been quick to exploit this weakness, which has likely emboldened it to put even more pressure on India. This shift has far-reaching consequences for New Delhi’s foreign policy, chief among them how it approaches its partnership with Washington. India fears being boxed into an alliance, but it can no longer wish away the Chinese threat.

The Yangtse plateau lies in India’s Tawang district, which is claimed by China. The sixth Dalai Lama was born in Tawang in the 17th century, and the district is home to the second-largest Tibetan Buddhist monastery in the world. Dai Bingguo, a Chinese diplomat who led border negotiations with India for a decade, argued in a 2017 interview that the territory that includes Tawang is “inalienable from China’s Tibet.” “Even the British colonialists who drew the illegal ‘McMahon Line’ respected China’s jurisdiction over Tawang,” he said.

The McMahon Line, although not formally accepted by the Chinese, serves as the de facto border between Arunachal Pradesh and Tibet. Henry McMahon, the British foreign secretary of colonial India, drew the line on a map with a thick red pen in 1914 during negotiations over the status of Tibet. In some places, the line violates its own principle of following the highest watershed, creating discrepancies on the ground. Yangtse is one such area of dispute, as established during border talks in the 1990s.

India first occupied the area in 1986, during the seven-year Sumdorung Chu crisis with China—a major standoff over the Yangtse plateau. It’s understandable why the PLA wants to control the 17,000-foot ridge, as military commanders agree on its tactical importance. It offers an unrestricted view of the entire Tawang Valley and Bum La pass, providing a tactical advantage. A Chinese military patrol was pushed back by India there as recently as October 2021; this year, the PLA sealed a road and constructed a camp around 500 feet short of the ridge.

Other reports suggest that clashes such as the one on Dec. 9 have taken place in Arunachal Pradesh two or three times a month on average recently, and that the Indian government has succeeded at keeping the incidents largely under wraps until now. Indian media reports that since the start of summer, the PLA has been “overtly aggressive” at the border with Arunachal Pradesh. Likewise, in the Doklam plateau in Bhutan, the site of a 73-day standoff over a Chinese construction project in 2017, the PLA has built a new bridge.

These Chinese grey zone operations—falling below the threshold of war—have gone on while tensions between the two armies in Ladakh remain high. There, each side still deploys more than 50,000 additional soldiers, Indian soldiers can’t access areas they patrolled in 2020, and border talks have failed to provide a breakthrough. If the PLA can try to dislodge India from a place like Yangtse, where New Delhi has deployed for decades, then it surely can target any place on the LAC at its will. Effective deterrence is a function of visible capacity to inflict unacceptable damage—whether military, economic, or diplomatic. The situation as it stands reflects India’s increasing inability to deter China on the disputed border.

Since the Ladakh crisis began, trade between India and China has reached record highs. India is the biggest recipient of grants from the Beijing-based Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. This economic entanglement has further diminished India’s deterrence. Meanwhile, New Delhi has taken few diplomatic steps to dissuade Beijing from incursions. In addition to attending multilateral summits hosted by China and inviting Chinese delegations to India, the Indian military has participated with the PLA in joint exercises. New Delhi has not undertaken any quid pro quo military operations to take control of Chinese territory on the border, which it could use as a bargaining chip to reverse Beijing’s ingresses in Ladakh.

Despite these realities, around 70 percent of Indians now believe the country could defeat China militarily. Modi has avoided any public conversation about China’s border threat. After the Galwan Valley clashes, which killed 20 Indian soldiers, the prime minister said on national television that “no one has intruded into our territory.” In Beijing’s view, New Delhi is reluctant to acknowledge any aggressive Chinese actions to prevent embarrassment to Modi, and hesitant to follow through threats out of fear of further escalation.

Modi’s brief exchange with Chinese President Xi Jinping at this year’s G-20 summit also failed to yield any result in the border dispute. Vijay Gokhale, who previously served as India’s foreign secretary and ambassador to Beijing, recently recommended that India should “convey signals more credibly and transparently.” In Gokhale’s words, the Modi government’s current actions corroborate Beijing’s long-held vision of New Delhi as “unequal as well as untrustworthy.”

The ongoing tensions at the India-China border inevitably shape Modi’s foreign policy. India has so far continued to pursue relationships with regimes shunned by the West, despite U.S. President Joe Biden calling ties with India the “the most important relationship for the United States, into the 21st century.” Before the war in Ukraine, India imported less than 1 percent of its crude oil from Russia; now more than 20 percent of its crude supplies come from Russia. India is collaborating with Iran on an infrastructure project to shorten the supply lines from Russia and engages with the military junta in Myanmar.

Aiming for a multipolar world, New Delhi has rarely backed the West at multilateral forums, but it hasn’t voted with Russia either. India simultaneously wants be part of the global south and have a seat at the global north’s table. But New Delhi can only pursue this independent course if it has the freedom to maneuver. Instead, its immediate and proximate challenge has become its biggest concern, forcing it to view all its foreign-policy choices through that prism. China has compelled India to reconsider choices that it has so far sidestepped, including a closer security and intelligence partnership with the United States and its allies.

The most important decision India currently faces is whether to officially join forces with the United States to counter China. Most observers see the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, known as the Quad (comprising Australia, India, Japan, and the United States), as a potential showcase for that cooperation. Kurt Campbell, the White House Indo-Pacific czar, recently revealed that New Delhi was reluctant to have the Quad hold a leaders’ summit. When the United States explored whether the Quad could develop military teeth, the Indian side restated its discomfort.

More than three years after the United States agreed to have Indian liaison officers at the Indo-Pacific Command and Special Operations Command, the Indian government has not yet nominated one. New Delhi has not responded enthusiastically to the Australian Navy’s request to send an Indian submarine to dock in Perth, Australia; Japan also speaks in whispered tones about the depth or lack thereof of India’s commitment to regional security, including over Taiwan.

Ultimately, New Delhi’s reluctance to fully commit to an anti-China security partnership also reflects its apprehension about provoking Beijing. It is the only member of the Quad that shares a land border with China and recognizes that it must deal with a continental security challenge from China on its own; the United States would not take a risk over Tawang. Nevertheless, Beijing continues to view New Delhi through the prism of its ties with Washington. It does not wish to grant India the status of a regional power to be dealt on its own terms.

The Dec. 9 clash at Tawang underlines again that India cannot escape the Chinese threat on its border. The government’s tactic of staying silent until the crisis blows over has only made the Chinese more belligerent. Since the latest clash followed Modi’s personal overture to Xi, it should be evident that the prime minister’s personality-driven diplomacy has failed. Modi has turned national energy to focus on event management around India’s G-20 presidency next year, but that won’t diminish China’s intimidating stance either.

The status quo has changed, deterrence has broken down, and Beijing’s threat looms larger by the day. Sooner or later, India will have to take more decisive action.

India And Bhutan Agree To Enhance Collaboration In Energy, Trade And Education

The Indian delegation made a two-day visit to Bhutan just weeks after China and Bhutan agreed to push forward boundary negotiations. On Friday, the Indian Foreign Secretary Vinay Mohan Kwatra concluded his two-day official visit to Bhutan. Both the sides agreed to enhance cooperation between the two nations in various sectors, including energy and education.

“We agreed to enhance collaboration in sectors such as energy, education, and digital through increasing investment prospects in specific projects that will generate lasting positive impacts. Also discussed strengthening trade-related infrastructure and exploring e-commerce platforms to expand our reach in India’s market,” the Bhutan’s PMO said in a statement.

In a statement released by the Indian embassy in Bhutan, the embassy stated that the Kwatra spoke to, “The Fourth King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, called on Prime Minister Lyonchhen (Dr) Lotay Tshering and Minister of Foreign Affairs and External Trade Lyonpo (Dr) Tandi Dorji, and held bilateral consultations with Foreign Secretary Aum Pema Choden.” The embassy made it clear that the two sides held “wide-ranging” discussions over several issues.

Meanwhile, the Indian ambassador to Bhutan Sudhakar Dalela took to Twitter to share some of the visuals of the “productive visit”

“Foreign Secretary @AmbVMKwatra concludes a productive two-day official visit to Bhutan. Engaging conversations, positive outcomes, expanding partnership. Thank you Team @IndiainBhutan for your tireless efforts in advancing close ties of friendship and cooperation,” Indian ambassador to Bhutan, Sudhakar Dalela wrote on Twitter. “It was a pleasure meeting Mr. Vinay Kwatra on his maiden official visit to Bhutan as the Foreign Secretary of India. We reviewed various issues of mutual interest and also held preliminary discussions on the next Plan,” the Bhutanese Foreign Minister Tandi Dorji wrote on Twitter.

During his visit, Kawatra met his Bhutanese counterpart Aum Pema Choden and both the Foreign Secretaries Co-chaired the 4th India-Bhutan Development Cooperation Talks (Plan Talks). The Indian embassy stated that Kwatra conveyed India’s firm commitment to Bhutan based on the “priorities of the government and people of Bhutan”. The Bhutanese side on the other hand shared their plans for Bhutan’s 13th Five-Year Plan in the context of ongoing transformation initiatives in Bhutan.

The visit came after border talks with China

Earlier this month, it was reported that China and Bhutan have reached a “positive consensus” over their border dispute. According to a joint statement released by the two nations, the consensus was reached at the 11th Expert Group Meeting (EGM) on the China-Bhutan Boundary issues which was held in China’s Kunming City. The boundary discussion between both sides is important to India since Doklam is a matter of concern for India. The contested region lies between China’s Chumbi Valley to the North, Butan’s Ha district to the east, and India’s Sikkim state to the west.

While China used to share a good relationship with Bhutan, things started deteriorating when China invaded Tibet in 1949. India, on the other hand, has shared a solid relationship with Bhutan for time immemorial. Since 1961, India has provided security assistance to landlocked countries. According to the embassy statement, the Indian and the Bhutanese Foreign Secretary jointly inaugurated several key projects during the visit. The projects, which are implemented with the assistance of the Government of India, include Citizen Service portals, the National Single Window portal, and Government Initiated Network Project under the Flagship Digital Drukyul Project.